AIFU Inc. (AIFU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AIFU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFU | $2.67 | +10.33% | 280.3M | -0.07 | -$33.22 | N/A |
| HIPO-WT | $0.62 | -6.37% | 55.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FNF | $47.87 | +1.74% | 12.8B | 16.97 | $2.81 | +4.21% |
| AIZ | $258.06 | +2.40% | 12.4B | 12.87 | $19.51 | +1.38% |
| FAF | $66.42 | +1.91% | 6.8B | 10.22 | $6.50 | +3.35% |
| ACT | $42.51 | +3.03% | 5.8B | 9.06 | $4.62 | +2.09% |
| MTG | $25.75 | +1.98% | 5.4B | 8.11 | $3.15 | +2.36% |
| ESNT | $58.67 | +3.24% | 5.3B | 8.22 | $7.03 | +2.30% |
| RDN | $34.63 | +3.19% | 4.6B | 7.98 | $4.29 | +2.99% |
| RYAN | $34.48 | +8.94% | 4.3B | 40.68 | $0.82 | +1.51% |
Stock Comparison
AIFU vs HIPO-WT Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check HIPO-WT's competition here
AIFU vs FNF Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while FNF trades at $47.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check FNF's competition here
AIFU vs AIZ Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while AIZ trades at $258.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AIZ's competition here
AIFU vs FAF Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while FAF trades at $66.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check FAF's competition here
AIFU vs ACT Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while ACT trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ACT's competition here
AIFU vs MTG Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while MTG trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check MTG's competition here
AIFU vs ESNT Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while ESNT trades at $58.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ESNT's competition here
AIFU vs RDN Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while RDN trades at $34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check RDN's competition here
AIFU vs RYAN Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while RYAN trades at $34.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 40.68. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check RYAN's competition here
AIFU vs AGO Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while AGO trades at $76.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AGO's competition here
AIFU vs NMIH Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while NMIH trades at $36.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check NMIH's competition here
AIFU vs EIG Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while EIG trades at $46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check EIG's competition here
AIFU vs TRUP Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 967.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while TRUP trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TRUP's competition here
AIFU vs TIPT Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 669.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while TIPT trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -18.01. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TIPT's competition here
AIFU vs HIPO Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while HIPO trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check HIPO's competition here
AIFU vs AMSF Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 584.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while AMSF trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMSF's competition here
AIFU vs ITIC Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 467.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while ITIC trades at $252.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ITIC's competition here
AIFU vs AMBC Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while AMBC trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMBC's competition here
AIFU vs MBI Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 309.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while MBI trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check MBI's competition here
AIFU vs OSG Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 249.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while OSG trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check OSG's competition here
AIFU vs JRVR Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while JRVR trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check JRVR's competition here
AIFU vs ICCH Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ICCH's competition here
AIFU vs AMBC-WT Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMBC-WT's competition here
AIFU vs PROS Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check PROS's competition here
AIFU vs TIG Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TIG's competition here
AIFU vs SNC Comparison June 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 280.3M. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $2.67, while SNC trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check SNC's competition here