First American Financial Corporation (FAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAF | $66.35 | +1.80% | 6.8B | 10.22 | $6.50 | +3.35% |
| HIPO-WT | $0.62 | -6.37% | 55.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FNF | $48.03 | +2.07% | 12.8B | 16.97 | $2.81 | +4.21% |
| AIZ | $259.39 | +2.92% | 12.4B | 12.87 | $19.51 | +1.38% |
| ACT | $42.65 | +3.36% | 5.8B | 9.06 | $4.62 | +2.09% |
| MTG | $25.78 | +2.10% | 5.4B | 8.11 | $3.15 | +2.36% |
| ESNT | $58.62 | +3.15% | 5.3B | 8.22 | $7.03 | +2.30% |
| RDN | $34.71 | +3.41% | 4.6B | 7.98 | $4.29 | +2.99% |
| RYAN | $35.01 | +10.62% | 4.3B | 40.68 | $0.82 | +1.51% |
| AGO | $76.65 | +2.45% | 3.3B | 8.63 | $8.73 | +1.91% |
Stock Comparison
FAF vs HIPO-WT Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check HIPO-WT's competition here
FAF vs FNF Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while FNF trades at $48.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check FNF's competition here
FAF vs AIZ Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while AIZ trades at $259.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AIZ's competition here
FAF vs ACT Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while ACT trades at $42.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check ACT's competition here
FAF vs MTG Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while MTG trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check MTG's competition here
FAF vs ESNT Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while ESNT trades at $58.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check ESNT's competition here
FAF vs RDN Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while RDN trades at $34.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check RDN's competition here
FAF vs RYAN Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while RYAN trades at $35.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 40.68. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check RYAN's competition here
FAF vs AGO Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while AGO trades at $76.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AGO's competition here
FAF vs NMIH Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while NMIH trades at $36.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check NMIH's competition here
FAF vs EIG Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while EIG trades at $46.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check EIG's competition here
FAF vs TRUP Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 967.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while TRUP trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check TRUP's competition here
FAF vs TIPT Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 669.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while TIPT trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -18.01. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check TIPT's competition here
FAF vs HIPO Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while HIPO trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check HIPO's competition here
FAF vs AMSF Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 584.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while AMSF trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AMSF's competition here
FAF vs ITIC Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 467.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while ITIC trades at $251.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check ITIC's competition here
FAF vs AMBC Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while AMBC trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AMBC's competition here
FAF vs MBI Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 309.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while MBI trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check MBI's competition here
FAF vs AIFU Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 280.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while AIFU trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIFU's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AIFU's competition here
FAF vs OSG Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 249.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while OSG trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check OSG's competition here
FAF vs JRVR Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while JRVR trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check JRVR's competition here
FAF vs ICCH Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check ICCH's competition here
FAF vs AMBC-WT Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AMBC-WT's competition here
FAF vs PROS Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check PROS's competition here
FAF vs TIG Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check TIG's competition here
FAF vs SNC Comparison June 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $66.35, while SNC trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check SNC's competition here